Information Paper for America’s Policy Makers:

(Original info paper chronology follows at the end of this document up to the latest Nov 99 failed FDA inspection of the manufacturer when the FDA reiterated: "the anthrax manufacturing process is not validated.")

(Please now refer to: www.majorbates.com for developments beyond Dec. ’99)

Professional Military Standards

"...What does the military officer do when he is ordered by a

Statesman to take a measure which is militarily absurd…?"

"The existence of professional standards justifies military disobedience."

Samuel Huntington, The Soldier and the State, p.77

Quoted in testimony to Congress, 12 Oct 1999:

http://www.house.gov/reform/hearings/healthcare/99.10.12/rempfer.htm

From The Washington Post Outlook Section, 30 January 2000:

http://www.majorbates.com/opinions/30jan_wp1.htm

&

http://www.majorbates.com/opinions/30jan_wp2.htm

 

Information Paper for America’s Policy Makers (Cont.):

Subject: DOD’s Anthrax Vaccine Immunization Program – (AVIP)

  1. Purpose: To inform senior policy makers on the DOD’s mandatory Anthrax Vaccination Immunization Program (AVIP), and its implications on the readiness and morale of the military.
  2. Background: In Dec 1997 SECDEF Cohen announced the AVIP program ostensibly due to perceived increase in threat from rogue states (Iraq, North Korea, etc.) and terrorists. (1) He mandated four conditions be met prior to start of the program. Hundreds of Servicemembers have since refused the vaccine – and have been subjected to various levels of military discipline. DOD asserts the vaccine is "safe, effective and FDA-approved." Vaccination refusals in the reserve components became public in Jan 1999 when eight officers (fighter pilots) in the Connecticut Air National Guard were forced to resign from their unit after they declined to be vaccinated. (2) The House Committee on Government Reform (Rep Shays R-CT) conducted hearings in Mar (3), Apr 1999 (4), June and July on the safety, efficacy, and necessity of the vaccine. Separately, in late Mar 1998 the GAO issued a study calling for a DOD-funded study on the presence of antibodies to squalene (an experimental, non-approved vaccine booster) in the blood of Gulf War Illness veterans. (5) A week later Vanity Fair (6) and Insight Magazine (7) reported on the possibility that in 1991 DOD had funded the development of anthrax vaccine using the experimental booster (adjuvant) squalene instead of the approved booster alum. DOD categorically denies producing a squalene based anthrax vaccine, although it admits funding human vaccine studies using squalene since 1988. (8) Rep Metcalf (9) (R-WA), Rep Mica (R-FL), and Rep Jones (10) (R-NC) have called for hearings by the House Armed Services Committee to investigate whether DOD produced and used experimental anthrax vaccine on soldiers. SECDEF Cohen recently stated, "I would be derelict in my duties" if he did not mandate the anthrax vaccine. (11)
  3. Discussion:

  1. Conclusion: Safety and efficacy of anthrax vaccine are in question. Congressmen are asking why a decades-old vaccine is now necessary against a threat that has existed even longer. SECDEF-mandated review of vaccine by a non-expert was cursory. DOD has used inaccurate information to convince military personnel of vaccine’s safety and the UCMJ to intimidate those opposed to program. Possible link between Gulf War Illness and anthrax vaccine exists.
  2. Recommendation: DOD should terminate the mandatory anthrax vaccinations pending an impartial review of the safety, efficacy, and doctrinal necessity of the AVIP.

 

Chronology

Jason Austin, 22, of Fritch, Texas

Michael McIntyre, 22, of Mount Vernon, Washington

Jared Johnston, 19, of Henryetta, Oklahoma

Michael Metzig, 20, of San Diego, California

Jared Schwartz, 20, Henderson, Kentucky

      1. The limited use of the vaccine to date, i.e., tests prior to approval of a vaccine by the Food and Drug Administration were on too small a scale to permit accurate assessments of types and severity of adverse reactions (only widespread use can provide this assessment);
      2. Insufficient experience in mass immunization programs to have truly evaluated the efficacy of the vaccine. Moreover, there was no way to predict whether the pathogen against which the vaccine could be used would be sufficiently similar to the pathogen used in tests to ensure vaccine efficacy. The Sec. of the Army found that performance of this contract would subject PRI to certain unusually hazardous risks defined in ATTACHMENT A:

DEFINITION OF UNUSUALLY HAZARDOUS RISKS: The risk of adverse reactions, or the failure to confer immunity against anthrax, from the administration to any person of the vaccine manufactured or delivered under this contract. For purposes of this clause, the phrase "adverse reactions" included anaphylaxis and other foreseeable adverse reactions, as well as, any unforeseen adverse reactions. (88)

Sections of the bill include:

SEC 1. SHORT TITLE: This Act may be cited as the `Department of Defense Anthrax Vaccination Moratorium Act'.

SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS. It is the sense of Congress that--

(1) a single force protection measure such as the mandatory anthrax vaccine immunization program should not be implemented by the Department of Defense without regard for that measure's own effects on morale, retention, recruiting, and budget; and

(2) an insufficiently proven vaccine should not be advocated as a substitute for research, development, and production of truly effective vaccines and essential antibiotics, adequate personal protective equipment, detection devices, and nonproliferation measures.

SEC. 3. MORATORIUM OF VACCINATION PROGRAM.

SEC. 4. STUDY BY NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH.

SEC. 5. GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE STUDY.

SEC. 6. BOARDS FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS -- The Secretary of Defense shall direct that the respective Boards for Correction of Military Records of the military departments shall, upon request by individual members or former members of the Armed Forces, expedite consideration of applications for remedies for adverse personnel actions (both voluntary and involuntary) that were a result of the mandatory anthrax vaccine immunization program, to including rescission of court-martial convictions, rescission of administrative discharges and separations, rescission of retirements and transfers, restoration of flying status, back pay and allowances, expunging of negative performance appraisal comments or ratings, and granting of physical disability certificates.

SEC. 7. CONTINGENT RESUMPTION OF VACCINATION PROGRAM. (92)

The FDA identified 30 problem areas. Among them:

* The FDA could not verify whether the company's parameters for manufacturing temperatures, stirring speed, refrigeration times and holding times would guarantee that each batch would be identical.

* The company did not report that it failed potency-test results on some samples when using an FDA-approved calculation method, rather than an unapproved method company officials thought was acceptable.

* BioPort has not completely demonstrated it can always manufacture the vaccine without bacterial contamination.

* The company's internal procedures for reporting deviations from the normal manufacturing process lacked a timeframe for concluding investigations, and did not fully address when the deviation reports should be written.

[The tabulated data below is constantly being updated to reflect maximum accuracy. It is a compilation of concerned Servicemembers and citizen's inputs from around the country to aid in the ongoing investigations and inquiries by Congressional sources. The objective is to analyze future retention implications so that long-term readiness will not suffer. This data represents a small fraction of the total Guard and Reserve force. (113).]

UNIT

AIRCREW

OTHERS

AK ANG

28

?

AZ USAFR

?

?

AZ ANG

20

?

CA ANG

20

?

CA USAFR

76

?

CT ANG

8

23

DE USAFR

99

?

GA ANG

14

?

HI ANG

0

1

IN ANG

20

?

IN USAFR

23

?

KS ANG

1

?

KS USAFR

10

?

KY ANG

?

?

MA ANG

4

1

MD USAFR

6

?

ME ANG

19

50

MI ANG

29

1

MN USAFR

18

?

MS ANG

39

5

NC USAFR

6

?

NJ ANG

16

?

NJ USAFR

23

?

NM ANG

6

?

NY ANG

47

100

OH ANG

20

5

OK ANG

29

61

OK USAFR

17

?

OR USAFR

5

?

PA ANG

3

2

SC ANG

4

?

SC USAFR

1

?

TN ANG

29

38

TX ANG

19

?

TX USAFR

15

?

VA ANG

6

?

VT ANG

5

15

WA ANG

4

?

WA USAFR

45

?

WI ANG

7

13

Totals:

741

315

Updated by: Major Thomas L. Rempfer

Please email corrections or comments to:

TRempfer@aol.com

References:

1 http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Dec1997/b12151997_bt679-97.html

2 http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Jan1999/t01211999_t121asd_.html

3 http://www.house.gov/reform/ns/press/pressreleasefor3-24.htm

4 http://www.house.gov/reform/ns/press/press4-29.htm

5 http://www.gao.gov/new.items/ns99005.pdf

6 Gary Matsumoto, Vanity Fair, May 1999, pages 82-98. No internet access.

7 http://web2.insightmag.com/investiga/gulf5.html

8 http://www.gao.gov/new.items/ns99005.pdf

9 http://www.house.gov/metcalf/spence.htm

10 http://www.house.gov/jones/pr_990427a.htm

11 http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Mar1999/n03101999_9903103.html

12 http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Dec1997/b12151997_bt679-97.html

13 http://www.house.gov/reform/ns/hearings/testimony/testimonybailey.htm

14 http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Mar1999/n03121999_9903123.html

http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Feb1999/n02091999_9902091.html

15 Thomas Williams, Hartford Courant, 26 Apr 1999, page A1, available at: http://www.courant.com/news/archive

16 http://www.house.gov/reform/ns/hearings/testimony/mrchan4-30.htm

17 http://www.sciam.com/1296issue/1296cole.html

18 http://www.foreignpolicy.com/Fall98/articles/ART4.htm

19 First Dr. Burrow Letter to DOD, http://www.defenselink.mil/other_info/burrows.html

2nd Dr. Burrow Letter to Congress, http://www.dallasnw.quik.com/cyberella/Anthrax/Burrow_4_99.htm

20 http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Mar1998/n03031998_9803036.html

http://www.af.mil/news/Apr1998/n19980416_980507.html

http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Aug1998/t08171998_t814ntrx.html

http://www.house.gov/reform/ns/hearings/testimony/testimonybailey.htm

21 Army Times, 8 Mar 1999, page 3 (also appeared in the Navy Times), www.armytimes.com

22 http://www.af.mil/cgi-bin/multigate/retrieve?u=z3950r://dtics11:1024/airforce!F105345%3a926141695%3a%28cohen%20and%20anthrax%29;esn=FT%5fTEXT%20HTML%200;ct=text/html

23 http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Nov1998/n11051998_9811051.html

http://www.usmc.mil/Anthrax.nsf – see 28 Jan 1999 comments by Commandant of Marine Corps

24 http://www.house.gov/reform/ns/hearings/testimony/testimonyoflunbom3-24.htm

http://www.house.gov/reform/ns/hearings/testimony/statement_of_sergeant_michael_4-29.htm

25 http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Dec1997/x12181997_x1215mfp.html

26 http://www.senate.gov/~judiciary/carus.htm

27 http://cns.miis.edu/research/cbw/pdd-39.htm

28 http://www.defenselink.mil/speeches/1997/di1204.html

29 http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Feb1997/b021497_bt075-97.htm

http://www.defenselink.mil/news/May1997/b050197_bt211-97.html

http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Jun1997/t060297_t0530lac.html

http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Nov1997/t11251997_t1125ptr.html

http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Dec1997/t12091997_t204usuk.html

http://www.defenselink.mil/speeches/1998/di1316.html

http://www.defenselink.mil/speeches/1998/di1317.html

http://www.defenselink.mil/speeches/1998/di1332.html

http://www.defenselink.mil/speeches/1999/s19990220-secdef.html

30 http://www.dallasnw.quik.com/cyberella/Anthrax/Mar97.html (transcript of FDA report obtained under FOIA)

31 http://www.dallasnw.quik.com/cyberella/Anthrax/warning.html (transcript of FDA report obtained under FOIA)

32 http://www.house.gov/reform/ns/hearings/testimony/mrchan4-30.htm

33 http://www.defenselink.mil/pubs/domestic/index.html

34 http://cns.miis.edu/research/cbw/domestic.htm

35 http://www.defenselink.mil/pubs/domestic/3.html

36 http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Jul1997/t07311997_t0731coh.html

37 http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Nov1997/t11251997_t1125ptr.html

38 http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Dec1997/b12151997_bt679-97.html

39 Thomas Williams, Hartford Courant, 26 Apr 1999, page A1, available at: http://www.courant.com/news/archive

40 http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Dec1997/x12181997_x1215mfp.html

41 http://www.defenselink.mil/other_info/burrows.html

42 http://www.dallasnw.quik.com/cyberella/Anthrax/Burrow_4_99.htm

43 http://www.dallasnw.quik.com/cyberella/Anthrax/anthrax1.htm

44 http://www.defenselink.mil/news/May1998/x05281998_x0522mfp.html

45 http://www.house.gov/reform/ns/hearings/testimony/cain4-30.htm

46 http://www.house.gov/reform/ns/hearings/testimony/testimonyforgreenleaf.htm

47 http://cns.miis.edu/research/cbw/pdd-62.htm

http://thomas.loc.gov, Section 511, FY 1999 National Defense Authorization Act

48 http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Aug1998/t08171998_t814ntrx.html

49 http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/10/12304.text.html

50 http://cns.miis.edu/research/cbw/, Section 511, FY 1999 National Defense Authorization Act

51 Thomas Williams, "Pilots Quit Bradley Unit In Anthrax Dispute," Hartford Courant, 15 Jan 1999, available at: http://www.courant.com/news/archive

52 http://www.house.gov/reform/ns/hearings/testimony/written_testimony_of_maj.htm

53 http://www.dallasnw.quik.com/cyberella/Anthrax/refute.html

54 http://www.pub.whitehouse.gov/uri-res/I2R?urn:pdi://oma.eop.gov.us/1999/1/22/9.text.1

55 http://cns.miis.edu/research/cbw/factcbw.htm

56 http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Jan1999/m01201999_m005-99.html

57 http://www.govexec.com/features/0199/0199s2.htm

58 http://www.roa.org/legislation/R99-8.html

59 http://www.dallasnw.quik.com/cyberella/Anthrax/DoD_answ.html

60 http://www.af.mil/cgi-bin/multigate/retrieve?u=z3950r://dtics11:1024/airforce!F106849%3a926141695%3a%28cohen%20and%20anthrax%29;esn=FT%5fTEXT%20HTML%200;ct=text/html

61 http://www.house.gov/reform/ns/hearings/testimony/testimonyofzaid3-24.htm

62 http://www.af.mil/cgi-bin/multigate/retrieve?u=z3950r://dtics11:1024/news!F6872%3a926145334%3a%28anthrax%29;esn=FT%5fTEXT%20HTML%200;ct=text/html

63 http://www.hhs.gov/news/press/1999pres/990209.html

64 http://www.hopkins-id.edu/bioterror/index.html

65 http://www.hopkins-id.edu/bioterror/bioterr_17.html

66 http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Mar1999/n03101999_9903103.html

67 http://209.238.86.120/conferences/PreviousConferences/h3a.htm

68 www.house.gov/reform/ns

69 http://www.gao.gov/new.items/ns99005.pdf

70 Gary Matsumoto, Vanity Fair, May 1999, pages 82-98. No Internet access.

71 http://web2.insightmag.com/investiga/gulf5.html

72 http://www.af.mil/news/Apr1999/n19990401_990558.html

73 www.defenselink.mil/news/Mar1999/n03311999_9903317.html

74 www.aapsonline.org

http://www.oism.org/ddp

75 http://www.yahoo.com, news, 14 May 99

76 www.af.mil/news/Apr1999/n19990423_990759.html

77 http://www.house.gov/reform/ns/hearings/testimony/witnesses4-30.htm

http://www.house.gov/reform/ns/hearings/testimony/mrchan4-30.htm

78 Navy Times, 10 May 1999, editorial, page 56, www.navytimes.com

79 http://www.salonmagazine.com/health/feature/1999/05/13/anthrax/index.html

80 Thomas Williams, "Anthrax shots are resumed after Hiatus," Hartford Courant, 12 May 1999, http://www.courant.com/news/archive

81 25-27 May 1999, Fort Detrick, MD; AVIP Info Brief & Slide Show Presentation Data (transcribed), by Maj. Strawder. http://www.dallasnw.quik.com/cyberella/Anthrax/FtDetrick5_99.html

82 http://www.cbs.com/flat/story_160341.html

83 http://www.madison.com, view article by Richard W. Jaeger, Wisconsin State Journal, 19 June 99.

84 http://www.dallasnw.quik.com/cyberella/Anthrax/Kern_summ.htm http://www.house.gov/reform/ns/hearings/testimony/new_page_6.htm

85 NEWS RELEASE for 30 June 1999 AVIP Hearings, Chairman Congressman Shays, POC - Mr. Halloran, (202) 225-2548, House Subcommittee on National Security, Veteran Affairs and International Relations, 24 June 1999. http://www.house.gov/reform/ns/hearings/testimony/statement_of_rep_630.htm

86 http://www.uniontrib.com/news/military/990629-0010_8n29anthrax.html

87 Anthrax Vaccine Firm in Trouble; Pentagon's Inoculation Program Supplier Near Bankruptcy; By Bradley Graham; Washington Post Staff Writer; Thursday, July 1, 1999; Page A2.

88 http://www.dallasnw.quik.com/cyberella/images/91Mem_gif.gif

http://www.dallasnw.quik.com/cyberella/images/91Mem2_gif.gif

http://www.dallasnw.quik.com/cyberella/images/91MemA_gif.gif

89 http://www.airforcetimes.com

90 http://www.house.gov/reform/ns/press/subcommittee_press_releases5.htm

91 16 June 99, Congressman Jones of NC introduces legislation to make AVIP voluntary, . http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d106:HR02543:@@@P

92 Congressman Gilman of NY introduces moratorium bill, http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d106:HR02548:@@@P

93 http://www.house.gov/reform/ns/hearings/testimony/july_21.htm

94 The Washington Post, p. A19, 26 July 1999.

95 http://www.courant.com/news/archive/aug13%2Dctnews16.stm

96 The Washington Post, p. A15, 14 August 1999.

97 The Washington Post, p. A15, 16 August 1999.

98 http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Aug1999/n08171999_9908176.html

99 http://www.insightmag.com/articles/story1.html#linkTOP, http://www.insightmag.com/articles/story2.html

100 Thomas Williams, Hartford Courant, 29 August 1999, page A1, http://www.courant.com/news/archive

101Matthew Hay Brown, Hartford Courant, 17 September 1999, http://www.courant.com/news/archives

102 http://www.sftt.org/articles/shooting_straight.shtml

103 http://www.courant.com/news/special/anthrax/index.stm

104 http://www.house.gov/reform/ns/press/witness_list929.htm

105 http://www.house.gov/reform/ns/press/heemstra.htm

106 http://www.house.gov/hasc/openingstatementsandpressreleases/106thcongress/99-09-30buyer.pdf

107 http://www.pub.whitehouse.gov/uri-res/I2R?urn:pdi://oma.eop.gov.us/1999/10/1/8.text.1

108 http://www.house.gov/reform/hearings/healthcare/99.10.12/index.htm

http://www.sunspot.net/cgi-bin/editorial/story.cgi?section=archive&storyid=1150160203453

109 http://www.gulflink.osd.mil/library/randrep/pb_paper

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/health/july-dec99/anthrax_10-21.html

http://www.usatoday.com/life/health/general/lhgen165.htm

http://www.usatoday.com/life/cyber/tech/ctg458.htm

110 http://www.house.gov/reform/ns/press/hear1020.htm

http://www.house.gov/hasc/testimony/106thcongress/99-10-20alibek.htm

111 www.gao.gov, Medical Readiness: DoD Faces Challenges in Implementing It's Anthrax Vaccination Immunization Program, GAO/NSIAD-00-36, October 22, 1999

112 http://www.airforcetimes.com/stories/airf23.htm

113 Email corrections or comments to: TRempfer@aol.com, http://www.dallasnw.quik.com/cyberella/Anthrax/editorial.html

Current as of the 1 May 2000

Please refer from this point to www.majorbates.com

To view chronology beyond December 1999.

Produced by Americans encouraging a review of the AVIP

Updated by: Major Thomas L. "Buzz" Rempfer

Please email corrections or comments to:

TRempfer@aol.com

(In the near-term, this info paper is prepared to inform senior policy makers on the DOD’s mandatory Anthrax Vaccination Immunization Program (AVIP), and its implications on the readiness and morale of the military. In the long-term, comprehensive and realistic force protection, and the health rights of American Servicemembers must become a priority.)

To view additional Information on Anthrax, use the weblinks below:

http://www.anthrax.osd.mil/

www.majorbates.com

http://www.dallasnw.quik.com/cyberella/index.htm

Research by CT ANG Tiger Team, led by Major Russ Dingle, REdingle@ziplink.net

http://www.dallasnw.quik.com/cyberella/Anthrax/refute.html